Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of the CTNS Gene (2024)

Main

Cystinosis is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in CTNS gene, which encodes for cystinosin (1). In its most severe form, termed nephropathic cystinosis (NC), the disease is characterized by early onset renal Fanconi syndrome leading to renal failure and by corneal cystine (CySS) crystal depositions. Thereafter, other symptoms develop as CySS accumulates in tissues (1) (2).

The CTNS gene encodes for a CySS carrier that is primarily localized in the lysosomal membrane (3). A second isoform, termed cystinosin-LKG, originates from a differential splicing of the last exon and has been shown to encode for a protein that is targeted also to other cell compartments (4). Mutations in the CTNS gene are detected in the majority of patients with NC (1,5). In addition, mutations in the CTNS promotor have been found in three patients (6). In other cell models, cell concentration of amino acids have been shown to modulate gene activity and expression (7,8). For example, amino acid deprivation stimulates the expression of transporters such as the system A subtype, neutral amino acid transporter A2, CD98 light chain, cationic amino acid transporter-1, or the cystine/glutamate transporter (912). Transcriptional regulation of these genes is often mediated by specific sequences, termed amino acid responsive elements (AAREs), that are located in the promotor regions and, occasionally, in the first intronic regions (13).

Recently, we have reported that CTNS gene expression is regulated by intracellular thiols in HK2 human kidney cells. CySS and cysteine (Cys) depletion for 48 h caused a 2-folds increase in CTNS mRNA that paralleled with an increase in the expression of cystinosin (14). Changes in CTNS transcript levels were associated with Cys concentrations and with the redox status of the [Cys/CySS] couple. These effects were partially reverted by treatment with N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) or with glutathione ethyl ester (14). The aim of this study was to further elucidate the mechanisms that regulate CTNS gene expression.

METHODS

Cell culture.

Human kidney tubular cells (HK2, ATTCC CRL-2190) were cultured in 95% medium supplemented with 5% FCS (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Milan, IT), ITS Liquid Media Supplement (Sigma Chemical Co.-Aldrich, Milan, IT), and penicillin/streptomycin (Euro Clone, Pavia, IT). Media used in the experiments included regular DMEM containing 200 μM of CySS and a “low CySS DMEM” containing 20 μM CySS. This later medium was prepared by mixing in a 9:1 ratio DMEM without CySS, Cys, and methionine (Sigma Chemical Co.-Aldrich) and regular DMEM.

Construction of promotor fragments.

Overlapping segments of the CTNS promotor (6) were amplified by PCR from human genomic DNA using pairs of primers listed in Table 1 and cloned in the PGL4.17 Firefly Luciferase reporter vector (Promega, Milan, IT). The hom*o Sapiens clone RP11-48B14 (GenBank: AC132942.16) was used as reference with the initiation of transcription site located at position 1495 (Fig. 1).

Full size table

Schematic representation of the initial part of the CTNS gene. The promoter region is shown in gray, introns are shown in white, and exons (Ex) are shown in black. The sequences of the promoter corresponding to the oligonucleotides used for Sp-1 binding assays are highlighted in black −308/−284, −440/−407, and −712/−683; the −440/−407 oligonucleotide contains two Sp-1 consensus sequences. The putative (5′-TGATGCAAA-3′) AARE in the intron 2 at position +3329 is also highlighted in black.

Full size image

Most amplicons encompass sequences located in the 5′ UTR region. In addition, a 4862-bp fragment, spanning the entire promotor through intron 2 was cloned. This fragment contains a consensus AARE sequence near the 3′ end at position +3329 bp (Fig. 1). A second construct containing the promotor region and the last 400 bp of intron 2 was also engineered. PCRs and insert cloning were performed using standard molecular biology protocols.

Transfections and luciferase detection.

HK2 cells were cultured in DMEM, low CySS DMEM, or in DMEM containing 10 mM NAC for 3 d and starved in serum-free medium for 24 h before the experiments. Cells were then transiently cotransfected at 80–90% confluence with the above described reporter vectors and with the Renilla-Luciferase vector [pGL4.74(hRluc/TK), Promega], which served as control to assess transfection efficiency using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies). After 24 h, cells were seeded in 96-well culture plates (Nunc, Rochester, NY) at a density of 1.9 × 104 cells per well. At 48 h, luciferase activity was assayed using the Dual GloTM Luciferase Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer instructions on a Wallac Victor (2) 1420 Multilabel Counter (Perkin Elmer, Life Sciences, Shelton, CT). Promotor activities were normalized by dividing the Firefly luciferase luminescence with the Renilla luminescence. All experiments were performed at least four times in duplicate.

CTNS mRNA stability analysis and cyclohexamide chase assay.

The half-life of CTNS mRNA was estimated using the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D (Act D; Sigma Chemical Co.-Aldrich) at a 5 μg /mL concentration. The effects of protein synthesis inhibition were assessed by measuring mRNA levels in media containing 5 μg/mL of the translation inhibitor cyclohexamide (CHX; Sigma Chemical Co.-Aldrich).

Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Oligo-p(dT)15 primed cDNA strings were obtained with the First-strand cDNA synthesis kit for RT-PCR (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). CTNS transcripts were amplified by PCR using the following pair of primers: 5′-ccctgaagctcgtagagaaatg-3′ (forward) and 5′-ggaggaacatctgcaggagg-3′ (backward). Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as a control housekeeping gene and was amplified using the following pair of primers: 5′-ctgcaccaccaactgcttag-3′ (forward); 5′-aggtccaccactgacacgtt-3′ (backward). PCR amplicons were resolved in a 1.2%-agarose gel and measured by densitometry with the Typhoon 8600 Variable Mode Imager (Amersham Pharmacia Biothec, Pittsburgh, PA) and Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).

Sp1 binding assay.

Nuclear fractions were isolated and processed using the Nuclear Extract and Sp-1 TransAM kits (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA) that allows detection of Sp-1 binding by ELISA. Briefly, multiwell plates were coated with 10 μM of custom designed biotinylated double-strand oligonucleotides, spanning the CTNS promotor regions −308/−284, −440/−407, or −712/−683 (Table 1, Fig. 1). These regions contain consensus sequences for the SP1 transcription factor at positions −299/−290, −437/−429, −426/−418, and −723/−715. Nuclear extracts were added to coated wells and were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Primary anti-Sp1 antibodies and secondary anti-rabbit-HRP-conjugated antibodies were then applied in sequence for 1 h at room temperature. Sp-1 binding was measured by colorimetry with the Benchmark Plus microplate spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories) at 450 nm, using a 655-nm reference wavelength. Binding specificity was assayed by competition experiments, where 20 μM of unlabeled double-strand oligonucleotides were added to coated wells.

Measurement of intracellular thiol levels and calculation of redox potentials.

Intracellular thiols were measured by HPLC as previously reported (15). Theoretical redox potentials (16) of the GSH/GSSG and Cys/CySS couples were calculated using the Nernst equation, Eh = E0 + RT/nF ln ([disulfide]/[thiol]2), where E0 is the standard potential for the redox couple (−264 mV for GSSG/GSH2), −250 mV for CySS/Cys2), R is the gas constant, T is the absolute temperature, n is the number of transferred electrons (e.g. 2), and F is Faraday's constant (16). Calculations were made assuming a dilution volume for Cys/CySS and GSH/GSSG of 5 μL/mg of protein.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for windows 11.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). All continuous data were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. All tests were two sided and considered significant for p values <0.05.

RESULTS

CTNS mRNA changes in different cell culture conditions.

As stated above, we have previously reported that CySS deprivation increases CTNS mRNA levels. Complete CySS deprivation, however, decreases substantially protein synthesis, preventing accurate measurements of luciferase activity. We have therefore conducted preliminary experiments using various concentrations of CySS in the culture medium. This allowed defining a minimum concentration of 15–20 μmol/L of CySS that induced maximal luciferase activity at 48 h. At lower concentrations, cell growth and luciferase activity decreased substantially (data not shown). On these bases, experiments in “low CySS DMEM” were carried at 20 μmol/L of CySS (e.g. 10 times less than regular DMEM). Under these conditions, cell growth was slowed by a mean of 34 ± 4% after 48 h (n = 4), when cells were plated at 20–30% confluency (data not shown). Therefore, cells cultured in low CySS medium were plated at higher density to reach a similar confluence to cell cultured in regular DMEM when luciferase activity was assessed.

CTNS mRNA levels, cell Cys, CySS, GSH, GSSG, and Eh for the [Cys/CySS] and [GSH/GSSG] redox couples under different culture conditions are reported in Table 2. As shown, CTNS mRNA increased by 2.3-folds in cell chronically cultured in low CySS medium. In parallel, the concentration of reduced thiols decreased significantly, whereas CySS and GSSG levels remained stable; this resulted in decreased Eh for both redox couples.

Full size table

Approximately the opposite effect was obtained after culturing cells in medium containing NAC. As indicated in Table 2, CTNS mRNA decreased by 42%. Lower CTNS mRNA levels were associated with a significant increase in all measured thiol concentrations and Eh of both redox couples.

CySS deprivation increased CTNS promotor activity.

To investigate the mechanisms underlying the regulation of CTNS mRNA levels, the promotor activity was assayed using luciferase as a reporter gene. Five overlapping fragments of the CTNS promotor (starting from bp −1) were cloned into the reporter vectors (Table 1, Fig. 2A). As shown in Fig. 2A, the luciferase activity increased 1.5 to 2.4-folds in all tested promotor segments in low CySS medium. Specifically, the luciferase activity driven by the longer promoter fragment (769 bp) increased from 331 ± 68 to 814 ± 88 Relative Luminescence Units (RLU; p < 0.001), whereas cells transfected with the shorter 81 bp fragment responded to low CySS concentration by an increase in luciferase activity from 117 ± 9 to 215 ± 18 RLU (p < 0.001, Fig. 2A). Longer CTNS fragments (769 bp, 348 bp, and 316 bp) containing the first 316 bp (3′ to 5′) of the promotor induced higher luciferase activity than shorter fragments (283 bp, 81 bp), indicating that the region located between bp −283 and bp −316 is critical to enhance promotor activity. All five tested promotor segments responded similarly to CySS depletion, raising the hypothesis that the first 81 bp may contain a thiol-sensitive region. To test this hypothesis, a sixth construct encompassing CTNS sequences located between bp −81 and bp −769 was generated. As shown in Fig. 2A, the luciferase activity driven by this latter plasmid was similar to the activity driven by the full-length promotor (−1/−769 bp).

Luciferase activities of CTNS promotor constructs. Promotor constructs are represented on the left. Hashed bars indicate the promotor regions that are cloned into each construct. Gray bars indicate the luciferase gene (LUC). DNA coordinates are indicated in numbers and in the x axis (B). (A and B) Luciferase activity in control cells and cells cultured in low CySS medium (20 μmol/L). (C) Luciferase activity in control cells and cells cultured in medium containing 10 mmol/L of NAC. ▪: DMEM; □: “low CySS DMEM” in A and B end “DMEM + NAC” in C; LUC = luciferase. *p < 0.001.

Full size image

AARE sequences are located in promotor or intronic regions of genes encoding for amino acid carriers and have been shown to regulate gene transcription in response to changes in amino acid concentrations. By electronic screening, we have identified a putative AARE sequence (5′-TGATGCAAA-3′) in intron 2, near exon 3 (Fig. 1). To test whether this sequence is involved in the regulation of CTNS gene transcription, a construct spanning the promotor region to the end of intron 2 was engineered (Fig. 2B). A second construct containing the promotor region and the last 400 bp of intron 2 was also engineered to test the effects of the putative AARE sequence when inserted closer to the promotor (Fig. 2B). The first construct elicited very low luciferase activity; the luminescence elicited by the second construct was higher but significantly lower than the luminescence elicited by plasmids containing only the full-length promotor (Fig. 2B). The AARE sequence added no noticeable sensitivity to changes in CySS concentration of the culture medium.

To confirm the CTNS promotor sensitivity to cell thiols, HK2 cells were cultured in medium containing 10 mM NAC. These results are reported in Fig. 2C. As shown, addition of NAC to the culture medium caused a 47–56% decrease in luciferase activity. The degree of inhibition of luminescence was comparable, in relative values, for all tested constructs. In absolute values, differences between constructs paralleled those observed in low CySS medium.

CySS deprivation increased CTNS mRNA stability.

The above data indicate that changes in CTNS mRNA levels related to CySS concentrations in the culture media are, at least in part, related to transcriptional regulation of the CTNS gene. To test whether posttranscriptional elements are also involved, cells were treated with ActD and with CHX.

As shown in Fig. 3A, CTNS mRNA levels decreased substantially from 1 ± 0.31 to 0.27 ± 0.27 (relative values) in 24 h, after blocking transcription in cells cultured in regular DMEM. mRNA decay was similar (from 1 ± 0.42 to 0.33 ± 0.12 in 24 h) after switching cells to a low CySS medium for 24 h (+ duration of the chase). Conversely, if cells were switched to low CySS medium for 48 h before inhibiting transcription, CTNS mRNA levels decrease significantly less rapidly (from 1 ± 0.27 to 0.80 ± 0.19, Fig. 3A), indicating a substantial stabilization of the mRNA.

CTNS mRNA levels after actinomycin and CHX treatment. (A) CTNS mRNA was measured after incubating cells in the presence of Act D. Cells were maintained in regular DMEM (squares) or were switched to low CySS medium for 24 h or 48 h (circles). mRNA was measured by RT-PCR and normalized for GADPH expression. (B) CTNS mRNA was measured in the presence (filled labels) or absence (empty labels) of CHX. mRNA was measured as in A. *p < 0.001.

Full size image

Translation inhibition experiments were performed after switching cells to low CySS medium in the presence or in the absence of CHX. As shown in Fig. 3B, in the absence of CHX (empty labels), mRNA levels remained stable in cells that were maintained in regular DMEM and increase after 48 h by 1.75 ± 0.20-folds (p < 0.001) when cell were switched to low CySS medium, as expected. In the presence of CHX, mRNA levels increased in a similar way in the latter group of cells. However, CTNS mRNA increased to levels comparable with low CySS medium in cells that were maintained in regular DMEM in the presence of CHX.

Taken together, these results indicate that CTNS mRNA degradation is an active process and raise the hypothesis that CHX blocks the synthesis of a protein or a group of proteins that are involved in this process.

CySS deprivation modifies Sp-1 binding to the CTNS promoter.

The Sp-1 transcription factor has been shown to bind specifically to the CTNS promotor and mutations involving consensus sequences for Sp1 have been shown to cause cystinosis (6). We have tested the effects of partial CySS deprivation on Sp-1 binding in three regions of the CTNS promotor that contain four consensus sequences for Sp-1. Nuclear fractions were collected from HK2 cells that were cultured for 5 d in regular DMEM or in low CySS DMEM and were assayed as described in the method section.

As shown in Fig. 4, specific binding was observed in two regions of the promotor that are included in the oligonucleotide probes −440/−407 and −308/−284. After partial CySS deprivation and after subtracting the nonspecific signal obtained after competition with nonlabeled oligonucleotides, Sp-1 binding increased on average by 112% using the probe −308/−284 (p < 0.001) and by 30% using the probe −440/−407 (p < 0.02).

Sp-1 binding assay. Sp1 binding activities of three different CTNS promotor regions (positions −316/−268, −450/−400, and −738/−680 from the translation start site). Binding of Sp-1 was assayed by ELISA (see text for details). □: DMEM; Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of the CTNS Gene (5): “low CySS DMEM.” Specificity was assayed by competition assays with unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides (▪). *p < 0.02, **p < 0.001.

Full size image

DISCUSSION

Cystinosis is a monogenic disease that is caused by mutations or deletions of CTNS gene that encodes for cystinosin (1,3,5). Until recently, cystinosin was considered to be a constitutive carrier of the lysosomal membrane, allowing the efflux of CySS as it accumulates in lysosomes after protein degradation. We have recently reported that the CTNS gene also encodes for cystinosin-LKG, which is also expressed in other cell compartments, and that cell incubation in CySS-depleted medium up-regulates the expression of both CTNS isoforms (4,14). By culturing cells in different conditions, including oxidizing conditions and after inhibiting GSH synthesis, we have shown that changes in CTNS mRNA correlate best (negative correlation) with cell Cys concentrations and with the Eh of the [Cys/CySS] redox couple (14).

To date, the physiopathology of cell damage in cystinosis has not been fully elucidated. Studies on human fibroblasts, on proximal tubular epithelial cells or using directly human tissues from patients with cystinosis, have shown that cystinotic cells are more prone to apoptosis and to autophagy, and that cysteinylation of proapoptotic kinases may be involved in this process and that in some cases mitochondrial function is impaired (1721).

To better understand the role of cystinosin in cells, we have begun analyzing the mechanisms involved in CTNS mRNA regulation. Our results indicate that the CTNS gene is actively regulated through mechanisms that operate both at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels.

Other examples of gene regulation by intracellular amino acids have been reported. These may involve coordinated activation of groups of genes that encode for transcription factors, enzymes, or cell transporters in response to cell stress induced by amino acid deprivation (7,8) or more targeted activation of specific transporters or enzymes. Changes in Cys concentration in HeLa cells, for example, modify the expression of several genes, including the C/EBP hom*ologous protein transcriptional factor and the asparagine synthetase genes (22). Similarly, CySS starvation in human hepatoma cells increases the expression of genes involved in Cys metabolism and transport, in GSH synthesis and in cell growth (23). More specific gene activation often requires the interaction of enhancers with specific AARE sequences that are located in the promotor region or in the first introns of genes (12,13,24,25). Disruption of the AARE sequence of the asparagine synthetase promotor, for example, inhibits gene transcription on asparagine deprivation (25). Similarly, CySS deprivation induces the transcription of the CySS/glutamate transporter through a specific AARE sequence located in its promotor (12). This same AARE sequence is present in the second intron of the CTNS gene and was therefore a cis-acting candidate region for the regulation of the CTNS gene. However, our results do not support this hypothesis. This AARE sequence of the CTNS gene may represent a remnant of an ancestral gene; alternatively, other cis- or trans-acting elements that were not active in our reporter gene system may be required to elicit its function.

Notwithstanding this result, our data clearly show that the CTNS promotor is activated when cells are cultured in low CySS medium, which causes a dramatic fall in cell thiol levels. Although these conditions are unlikely to be observed in vivo, the complex regulatory elements that we observed in vitro may play a crucial role in vivo, in particular, in the proximal tubular epithelium, which is compromised at the early stages of NC and where high amounts of CySS are reabsorbed. In addition, thiol depletion also induces cell oxidation. Although our previous data (14) support the hypothesis that high CTNS mRNA levels are driven primarily by Cys depletion rather than reactive oxygen species, we cannot rule out completely that increased CTNS mRNA are part of a broader response to oxidative stress.

The comparison of different promoter constructs activity in our study suggests that the thiol sensitivity of the CTNS promotor depends on other trans-acting elements. DNA strings encompassing bp −283 to bp −316 represent a critical region, as indicated by a marked increase in luciferase activity in transcripts containing this region and confirm the data by Phornphutkul et al. (6), who showed that a G > C mutation at position −295 bp causes cystinosis and reduces the binding of the Sp-1 transcription factor (6), which is involved in several cell processes, including apoptosis, cell differentiation, and cell cycle (26).

On these bases, we have tested the impact of changes in medium CySS concentrations on Sp-1 binding to the CTNS promotor. In partial contrast to our gene reporter results, which showed increased promotor activity even in constructs that do not contain Sp-1 binding sites, we observed increased Sp-1 binding to the consensus sequence located at position −308/−283 and to two other sequences that are contained in the −440/−407 oligonucleotide (the presence of two Sp-1 consensus sequences in this region may explain higher activity in our in vitro assays). The apparent contradiction between our gene reporter data and the results of our DNA binding experiments do not exclude that both mechanisms may be involved in vivo.

Significant posttranscriptional regulation was also demonstrated. Specifically, we observed that culturing cells in low CySS medium induced a very significant stabilization of the CTNS mRNA. A thorough description of the mechanisms involved in CTNS mRNA stability was beyond the scope of the present work. Our results are reminiscent of several other biological systems, such as the “classic” model of the transferrin receptor, whose mRNA half-life depends on cell iron concentrations (27,28). Mechanisms involved in mRNA stability and degradation include the action of “broad” spectrum RNAses, of gene-specific RNAses and of microRNAs, among others (29). Enzyme-mediated degradation of CTNS mRNA is in part supported by our CHX data. Hypothetically, cell culture in low CySS conditions inhibits the synthesis of a specific RNAse that decreases CTNS mRNA half-life. Alternatively, CHX could inhibit the synthesis of a repressor protein that operates at the transcriptional level.

Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, the present data demonstrate that the expression of CTNS mRNA is heavily regulated. Our previous data suggested that cytosolic Cys levels are the primary stimuli that regulate cystinosin expression (14). This would be consistent with mechanisms of regulation of other amino acid transporters. Once in the cytosol, CySS is reduced into Cys and is maintained in a reduced state by cell reducing systems, mainly by the GSH/GSSG couple. In experimental solutions, however, Cys is readily oxidized into CySS, preventing to test the effects of different Cys concentrations on CTNS mRNA synthesis with more direct experimental models, such as nuclear run-on assays.

Similar to iron or calcium, Cys is a highly reactive compound, which is essential to a number of cell processes, including protein and GSH synthesis but which can also become detrimental, causing cysteinylation of proteins, when it accumulates in excess.

The present data may shed new light in understanding cell damage in cystinosis. In addition to demonstrate that CTNS mRNA levels increase when cell need to augment their thiol content, inhibition of CTNS gene expression in the presence of excess of thiols may be equally important. Hypothetically, loss of regulation of cell Cys content secondary to CTNS mutations may lead to increased cytosolic Cys content and to abnormal cysteinylation of proteins, which would make cystinotic cells more prone to apoptosis (20,21). In this respect, it is interesting to notice that inhibition of CTNS mRNA by RNA interference in HK2 cells not only increases cell CySS but also cell Cys concentrations.

Abbreviations

AARE:

amino acid responsive element

Act D:

actinomycin D

CHX:

cyclohexamide

Cys:

cysteine

CySS:

cystine

Eh:

redox potential

GSH:

reduced glutathione

GSSG:

oxidized glutathione

NAC:

N-acetyl-l-cysteine

References

  1. Gahl WA, Thoene JG, Schneider JA . Cystinosis. N Engl J Med 347: 111–121 2002

    Article Google Scholar

  2. Theodoropoulos DS, Krasnewich D, Kaiser-Kupfer MI, Gahl WA 1993 Classic nephropathic cystinosis as an adult disease. JAMA 270: 2200–2204

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  3. Town M, Jean G, Cherqui S, Attard M, Forestier L, Whitmore SA, Callen DF, Gribouval O, Broyer M, Bates GP, van't Hoff W, Antignac C 1998 A novel gene encoding an integral membrane protein is mutated in nephropathic cystinosis. Nat Genet 18: 319–324

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  4. Taranta A, Petrini S, Palma A, Mannucci L, Wilmer MJ, De Luca V, Diomedi-Camassei F, Corallini S, Bellomo F, van den Heuvel LP, Levtchenko EN, Emma F 2008 Identification and subcellular localization of a new cystinosin isoform. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 294: F1101–F1108

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  5. Taranta A, Wilmer MJ, van den Heuvel LP, Bencivenga P, Bellomo F, Levtchenko EN, Emma F 2010 Analysis of CTNS gene transcripts in nephropathic cystinosis. Pediatr Nephrol 25: 1263–1267

    Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

  6. Phornphutkul C, Anikster Y, Huizing M, Braun P, Brodie C, Chou JY, Gahl WA 2001 The promoter of a lysosomal membrane transporter gene, CTNS, binds Sp-1, shares sequences with the promoter of an adjacent gene, CARKL, and causes cystinosis if mutated in a critical region. Am J Hum Genet 69: 712–721

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  7. Hyde R, Taylor PM, Hundal HS 2003 Amino acid transporters: roles in amino acid sensing and signalling in animal cells. Biochem J 373: 1–18

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  8. Fafournoux P, Bruhat A, Jousse C 2000 Amino acid regulation of gene expression. Biochem J 351: 1–12

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  9. Ling R, Bridges CC, Sugawara M, Fujita T, Leibach FH, Prasad PD, Ganapathy V 2001 Involvement of transporter recruitment as well as gene expression in the substrate-induced adaptive regulation of amino acid transport system A. Biochim Biophys Acta 1512: 15–21

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  10. Campbell WA, Sah DE, Medina MM, Albina JE, Coleman WB, Thompson NL 2000 TA1/LAT-1/CD98 light chain and system L activity, but not 4F2/CD98 heavy chain, respond to arginine availability in rat hepatic cells. Loss of response in tumor cells. J Biol Chem 275: 5347–5354

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  11. Hyatt SL, Aulak KS, Malandro M, Kilberg MS, Hatzoglou M 1997 Adaptive regulation of the cationic amino acid transporter-1 (Cat-1) in Fao cells. J Biol Chem 272: 19951–19957

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  12. Sato H, Nomura S, Maebara K, Sato K, Tamba M, Bannai S 2004 Transcriptional control of cystine/glutamate transporter gene by amino acid deprivation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 325: 109–116

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  13. Palii SS, Chen H, Kilberg MS 2004 Transcriptional control of the human sodium-coupled neutral amino acid transporter system A gene by amino acid availability is mediated by an intronic element. J Biol Chem 279: 3463–3471

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  14. Bellomo F, Corallini S, Pastore A, Palma A, Laurenzi C, Emma F, Taranta A 2010 Modulation of CTNS gene expression by intracellular thiols. Free Radic Biol Med 48: 865–872

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  15. Pastore A, Massoud R, Motti C, Lo Russo A, Fucci G, Cortese C, Federici G 1998 Fully automated assay for total hom*ocysteine, cysteine, cysteinylglycine, glutathione, cysteamine, and 2-mercaptopropionylglycine in plasma and urine. Clin Chem 44: 825–832

    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Jones DP, Carlson JL, Mody VC, Cai J, Lynn MJ, Sternberg P 2000 Redox state of glutathione in human plasma. Free Radic Biol Med 28: 625–635

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  17. Levtchenko E, de Graaf-Hess A, Wilmer M, van den Heuvel L, Monnens L, Blom H 2005 Altered status of glutathione and its metabolites in cystinotic cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20: 1828–1832

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  18. Mannucci L, Pastore A, Rizzo C, Piemonte F, Rizzoni G, Emma F 2006 Impaired activity of the gamma-glutamyl cycle in nephropathic cystinosis fibroblasts. Pediatr Res 59: 332–335

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  19. Laube GF, Shah V, Stewart VC, Hargreaves IP, Haq MR, Heales SJ, van't Hoff WG 2006 Glutathione depletion and increased apoptosis rate in human cystinotic proximal tubular cells. Pediatr Nephrol 21: 503–509

    Article Google Scholar

  20. Park MA, Pejovic V, Kerisit KG, Junius S, Thoene JG 2006 Increased apoptosis in cystinotic fibroblasts and renal proximal tubule epithelial cells results from cysteinylation of protein kinase C delta. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 3167–3175

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  21. Sansanwal P, Yen B, Gahl WA, Ma YW, Ying LH, Wong LJ, Sarwal MM 2010 Mitochondrial autophagy promotes cellular injury in nephropathic cystinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 272–283

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  22. Jousse C, Bruhat A, Ferrara M, Fafournoux P 2000 Evidence for multiple signaling pathways in the regulation of gene expression by amino acids in human cell lines. J Nutr 130: 1555–1560

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  23. Lee JI, Dominy JE, Sikalidis AK, Hirschberger LL, Wang W, Stipanuk MH 2008 HepG2/C3A cells respond to cysteine deprivation by induction of the amino acid deprivation/integrated stress response pathway. Physiol Genomics 33: 218–229

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  24. Bruhat A, Jousse C, Carraro V, Reimold AM, Ferrara M, Fafournoux P 2000 Amino acids control mammalian gene transcription: activating transcription factor 2 is essential for the amino acid responsiveness of the CHOP promoter. Mol Cell Biol 20: 7192–7204

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  25. Guerrini L, Gong SS, Mangasarian K, Basilico C 1993 Cis- and trans-acting elements involved in amino acid regulation of asparagine synthetase gene expression. Mol Cell Biol 13: 3202–3212

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  26. Tan NY, Khachigian LM 2009 Sp1 phosphorylation and its regulation of gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol 29: 2483–2488

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  27. Casey JL, Koeller DM, Ramin VC, Klausner RD, Harford JB 1989 Iron regulation of transferrin receptor mRNA levels requires iron-responsive elements and a rapid turnover determinant in the 3′ untranslated region of the mRNA. EMBO J 8: 3693–3699

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

  28. Seiser C, Posch M, Thompson N, Kuhn LC 1995 Effect of transcription inhibitors on the iron-dependent degradation of transferrin receptor mRNA. J Biol Chem 270: 29400–29406

    Article CAS Google Scholar

  29. Belasco JG 2010 All things must pass: contrasts and commonalities in eukaryotic and bacterial mRNA decay. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 467–478

    Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Rome, 00165, Italy

    Serena Corallini,Anna Taranta,Francesco Bellomo,Alessia Palma&Francesco Emma

  2. Laboratory of Biochemistry, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital and Research Institute, Rome, 00165, Italy

    Anna Pastore

Authors

  1. Serena Corallini

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  2. Anna Taranta

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  3. Francesco Bellomo

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  4. Alessia Palma

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  5. Anna Pastore

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

  6. Francesco Emma

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMedGoogle Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Emma.

Additional information

Supported by a grant from Cystinosis Research Foundation and in part by a grant from the Cystinosis Research Network.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corallini, S., Taranta, A., Bellomo, F. et al. Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of the CTNS Gene. Pediatr Res 70, 130–135 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182200187

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e3182200187

Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation of the CTNS Gene (2024)

FAQs

What does the CTNS gene do? ›

The CTNS gene codes for a lysosomal membrane protein, cystinosin, that mediates the transport of cystine from the lysosome.

What is posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression? ›

Post-transcriptional regulation is the control of gene expression at the RNA level. It occurs once the RNA polymerase has been attached to the gene's promoter and is synthesizing the nucleotide sequence.

Which mechanism of posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression can produce several different proteins from a single gene? ›

Alternative splicing is now understood to be a common mechanism of gene regulation in eukaryotes; according to one estimate, 70 percent of genes in humans are expressed as multiple proteins through alternative splicing.

What is a transcriptional regulation of gene expression? ›

The binding of specific transcriptional regulatory proteins to enhancers is responsible for the control of gene expression during development and differentiation, as well as during the response of cells to hormones and growth factors.

What is CTNS function? ›

Normal Function

The CTNS gene provides instructions for making a protein called cystinosin. This protein is located in the membrane of lysosomes, which are compartments in the cell that digest and recycle materials. Proteins digested inside lysosomes are broken down into smaller building blocks, called amino acids.

What is the mutation of the CTNS gene? ›

CTNS gene mutation is associated with cystinosis. Potential dual function of PQ-loop proteins such as cystinosin. To study the role of the cystinosin-LKG-isoform, we have investigated cystine accumulation and apoptosis that have been described in cystinotic cells.

What are two types of posttranscriptional processing? ›

Post-transcriptional modifications such as RNA editing and splicing diversify the proteome while limiting the necessary size of the genome.

Which of the following are involved in posttranscriptional control? ›

Practice Questions. Which of the following are involved in post-transcriptional control? Answer d. All of the above (control of RNA splicing, RNA shuttling, and RNA stability) are involved in post-transcriptional control.

What is an example of a posttranscriptional control? ›

An example is the process of RNA editing, which alters the nucleotide sequences of mRNA transcripts once they are transcribed.

What is an example of transcriptional gene regulation? ›

An example of this is the protein HSF1, which remains bound to Hsp70 in the cytosol and is only translocated into the nucleus upon cellular stress such as heat shock. Thus the genes under the control of this transcription factor will remain untranscribed unless the cell is subjected to stress.

Why is transcriptional regulation most important? ›

Transcription regulation plays an essential role in the development, complexity, and homeostasis of all organisms, as transcription is the first step in the universal pipeline of biological information flow from genome to proteome.

What is post-translational regulation? ›

Post-translational regulation refers to the control of the levels of active protein. There are several forms. It is performed either by means of reversible events (posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation or sequestration) or by means of irreversible events (proteolysis).

What is the CTNS gene deletion? ›

The most common mutation is a deletion of a large part of the CTNS gene (sometimes referred to as the 57-kb deletion), resulting in the complete loss of cystinosin. This deletion is responsible for approximately 50 percent of cystinosis cases in people of European descent.

What is the function of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene? ›

Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase [acetyl-CoA:chloramphenicol O3-acetyltransferase; EC 2.3. 1.28] is the enzyme responsible for high-level bacterial resistance to the antibiotic chloramphenicol. It catalyzes the transfer of an acetyl group from acetyl CoA to the primary hydroxyl of chloramphenicol.

What is the function of the acetyltransferase gene? ›

Acetyltransferases are one of the leading groups of enzymes which also involved in post-translational modifications. Acetylation plays important role in response to extracellular signals in regulating cellular processes.

What is the role of histone acetyltransferase in gene expression? ›

(A) Histone acetylation: Acetylation and deacetylation are catalyzed by histone acetyltransferase and histone deacetylase, respectively. Acetyl-CoA is a source and co-factor of acetylation. Histone acetylation occurs at lysine residues and it increases gene expression in general.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jonah Leffler

Last Updated:

Views: 5579

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jonah Leffler

Birthday: 1997-10-27

Address: 8987 Kieth Ports, Luettgenland, CT 54657-9808

Phone: +2611128251586

Job: Mining Supervisor

Hobby: Worldbuilding, Electronics, Amateur radio, Skiing, Cycling, Jogging, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Jonah Leffler, I am a determined, faithful, outstanding, inexpensive, cheerful, determined, smiling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.